|
Michael
Riley’s Feedback On the Black Music Vs Urban Music Debate (One Voice)
The
theme of the debate at Wembley was between the two titles, black music on
one end versus urban, and whether urban needed to exist at all as a title.
What was interesting about the people in the audience was that there was
quite a healthy American representation. The general thrust that came back
was one that from the American perspective was that, as far as urban was
concerned, it was a bit of a non-title. It was just a category. Everyone
understood it was black music, and they generally didn’t have a problem
with white artists performing black music where those artists actually
paid respect to the source.
What
they went to lengths to point out was that the majority of white artists
in the States have a black team around them of some description, Be it
management, writers, producers or whatever - there is a team around them.
They would simply “not be allowed to get away with it”. However, from
the UK perspective, at this conference, it was very different. The debate
was more centred around certain things that have already been highlighted
by the panel.
Like
the whole marketing of black music in the UK. We’ve adopted the term
urban as a marketing term, for as I said, multi-cultural ownership of
black music. And as part of that, the thrust of the debate there was to
say if you have a black face you are not saleable in the UK, it’s that
simple. There is a culture of, I think, institutionalised racism within
the companies which is borne out of ignorance as much as anything.
But
they will base their marketing on what they feel the black community to be
in terms of size, and that market is considered to be specialist and quite
small. So where a white artist will come along with exactly the same
music, they are considered more marketable plus internationally more
saleable, and this was kind of repeated from the audience. These were
their feelings.
And
again, somebody quoted an incident where they were actually a marketing
person for an artist, and they were told categorically from a particular
paper, “We’ll give you a page inside. We’ll give you two pages, but
we’ll not give you a front cover. And the reason why we won’t give you
a front cover is because our readers might be confused”.
When
they inquired as to what their readers might be confused about, they said
they might assume our paper is a black paper. The general thrust of it was
quite different from the American perspective as opposed to the UK
perspective.
|